Advertising:

M52TUB25 Tuning: Difference between revisions

From MS4X Wiki
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
They are exactly the same, except for the 22hp difference in power.
They are exactly the same, except for the 22hp difference in power.


Intake manifold runners have the same inner diameter and also the throttlebody is equal in size. Partnumbers differ only because of cable vs. DBW.  
Intake manifold runners have the same length, but different inner diameter. Also the throttlebody is equal in size.  


'''Let's find out how BMW limited the older M52TU in the ECU software'''
'''Let's find out how BMW limited the older M52TU in the ECU software'''

Revision as of 21:34, 13 February 2020

Let's tune the BMW M52TUB25 engine from 170hp to M54B25 level (192hp).

Basic difference is that the M52TU engines use cable throttle with MS42 and M54s use drive-by-wire with MS43.

Here are both engine compared in known data:

Engine Displacement Bore x Stroke Compression ratio Power Torque RPM limit
M52TUB25 2494cm³ 84mm x 75mm 10.5:1 170hp @ 5500rpm 245Nm @ 3500rpm 6500rpm
M54B25 2494cm³ 84mm x 75mm 10.5:1 192hp @ 6000rpm 245Nm @ 3500rpm 6500rpm

They are exactly the same, except for the 22hp difference in power.

Intake manifold runners have the same length, but different inner diameter. Also the throttlebody is equal in size.

Let's find out how BMW limited the older M52TU in the ECU software

DISA

This one is easy, there is only one small part load and an even smaller full load table to compare.

You can see, that exactly where the M52TU produces its peak power, the DISA flap shuts the path between the two differential runners, leading to less air filling inside the cylinder.

This actively prevents the engine from producing more power from 5500rpm upwards. By the way the 2.8L brother of this engine does the same.

Copying over the maps 1:1 should be enough here.

VANOS

Injection

Ignition